[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: 'Normal' condition number vs GLAMM condition number

From	"Diederik van Liere" <[email protected]>
To	<[email protected]>
Subject	Re: st: 'Normal' condition number vs GLAMM condition number
Date	Tue, 5 Sep 2006 13:37:11 +0200

Dear professor Williams and professor Kolenikov,

Thank you both for your quick reply, I will definitely take a look at
coldiag and collin. 

Best regards,
Diederik van Liere

Department of Information and Decision Sciences
RSM / Erasmus University

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: st: 'Normal' condition number vs GLAMM condition number
  - From: Richard Williams <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: st: how to handle missing observations in a regression model
Next by Date: Re: st: how to handle missing observations in a regression model
Previous by thread: Re: st: 'Normal' condition number vs GLAMM condition number
Next by thread: Re: st: 'Normal' condition number vs GLAMM condition number
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread