| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: significance of grouped contributions in Oaxaca decomposition
From |
"Van de Poel, Ellen" <[email protected]> |
To |
<[email protected]> |
Subject |
st: significance of grouped contributions in Oaxaca decomposition |
Date |
Fri, 9 Jun 2006 14:17:19 +0200 |
Dear Stalist users,
A question regarding the Oaxaca decomposition:
I use the command : oaxaca group1 group2, de esave
to generate detailed Oaxaca decomposition results.
Thereafter I want to group the contributions of some binary variables
that result from a categorical one. E.g. I want to group contributions
from all the (binary) income quintiles to get a general contribution
for income.
To get the statistal significance of this grouped contribution I use
the command :
nlcom (wealthcon:
_b[quintile1]+_b[quintile2]+_b[quintile3]+_b[qquintile4])
Now, the problem is that this only works for the "endowments
contribution". Through the _b[] command I cannot seem to get the
contributions from the coefficient and interaction effects. Although
they are visible when I do matlist e(b).
I cannot set a matrix and e.g. use A[1, columnumber] because then I
lose the standard errors of the estimates.
I would very much appreciate any helpful suggestion.
Ellen Van de Poel
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/