|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: Re: Robust with xttobit
From
"Marcella Nicolini" <[email protected]>
To
<[email protected]>
Subject
st: Re: Robust with xttobit
Date
Thu, 8 Jun 2006 10:55:13 +0200
Actually gllamm fits other kind of non linear models like poisson, probit,
but it does not support Tobit estimator.
You could use -xttobit- and bootstrap your standard errors.
Marcella
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 21:08:47 -0500
From: "Scott Merryman" <[email protected]>
Subject: st: RE: Robust with xttobit
You can estimate a random effects tobit with -gllamm-, which does provide
a
robust option. See
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-02/msg00708.html
and
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2004-02/msg00789.html
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:owner-
[email protected]] On Behalf Of Niru
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2006 8:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: Robust with xttobit
Hello, I had posted this two weeks ago and since I
didn't get a response, I'm posting it one last time,
desparately hoping to get some response.
Thanks.
Dear Statalisters,
I am using random effect tobit estimation and would
like to get robust standard errors. But "robust" and
"cluster" options are not allowed with "xttobit".
I also tried to use "xtintreg" (random effects
interval data regression) with "robust" option but
this is not allowed either.
Is there any way to get robust standard errors with
"xttobit"?
I would greatly appreciate any help,
thank you in advance.
Niru
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2025 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |