Richard, your suggestion worked like a charm. I was able to run the program and predict -u- as desired. I had previously tried setting the confidence level before regression without success.
Once again I am grateful for your and Scott's assistance.
----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Williams <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, June 3, 2006 11:04 am
Subject: Re: RE: st: Weighted random effects -rfregk-
> At 09:11 AM 6/3/2006, James J Walters wrote:
> >As suggested I downloaded the -xtregre2- and changed the version
> >required to 8.1. I encountered the following error message during
> >the display of results (set trace on).
> >
> >- display
> >
> >- ereturn di, level(`level') plus
> >= ereturn di, level() plus
> >option level() incorrectly specified
> >
> >I was not able to determine why this occurred.
>
> Perhaps 8.1 was pickier about this. I would suggest changing the
> line to
>
> ereturn di, plus
>
> Just skimming Scott's code, I am not sure how the level option got
> passed on anyway. If you want something other than 95% confidence
> intervals, then just use the -set level- command before calling
> xtregre2.
>
> -------------------------------------------
> Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
> OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
> FAX: (574)288-4373
> HOME: (574)289-5227
> EMAIL: [email protected]
> WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
> WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
