|
|  |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: RE: Why is some observations lost when specifying bw(1) in xtivreg2
|
From |
"Schaffer, Mark E" <[email protected]> |
|
To |
<[email protected]> |
|
Subject |
st: RE: Why is some observations lost when specifying bw(1) in xtivreg2 |
|
Date |
Fri, 12 May 2006 18:54:56 +0100 |
David,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> David Granlund
> Sent: 12 May 2006 15:38
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: Why is some observations lost when specifying
> bw(1) in xtivreg2
>
> I have a sample of 910 observations, 91 groups and 10 years,
> without any missing data. When I estimate a robust fixed
> effect model the Number of obs is correctly reported as 910,
> but when I also specify bw(1) the Number of obs is reported
> to be 842. Can someone help me with an explanation to this?
This came up on the list earlier this week:
http://www.stata.com/statalist/archive/2006-05/msg00295.html
Cheers,
Mark
> Thank you in advance for your help!
>
> Regards,
> David Granlund
>
>
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
