| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: non-response weights
I am attempting to create weights to account for non-response and am
wondering if my approach seems correct. Non-response to my outcome
variable of interest occurred because potential respondents were not
present in a given household when interviewers came by (all household
members present were interviewed). However, I do have
socio-demographic data on those respondents - such as years of
education, age, marital status, gender - which, in turn, appear to be
related to whether or not respondents were present (a quick-and-dirty
logistic regression with "not present" as the outcome indicated
significant socio-demographic relationships). I believe that this
situation lends itself to non-response weighting in my regressions, but
I have a couple of questions I'm hoping someone can clarify:
1) the svy/survwgt package appears to create non-response weights by
re-calibrating sample design weights. My dataset does not include
sample design weights because every person present in a given household
was interviewed (or proxied for in the case of children). Assuming
that the sample represents a random selection of households, is there
any problem with assigning everyone a sample design weight of "1"? The
non-response re-calibration would then adjust in relation to that
(constant) weight.
2) can the resulting weight generated by the "survwgt nonresponse"
command entered directly into the svyset command (e.g., "svyset
[pweight=nonresponsewgt], strata(householdid)")?
Thanks for any guidance people can provide.
Andrew Mitchell
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/