| |
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]
st: -mfx- after poisson
I have a balanced panel of 3 years with approximately 800 individuals
in each year (thus 2400 observations more or less). I ran a poisson
MLE with clustered and robust standard error correction. There were
several variables as regressors, but three worth mentioning (because
I think they are causing the problem) are
i.year
i.fip
i.year*i.fip
That is, I am controlling for year, state and state-year fixed
effects, and am using xi:poisson.
The ML converges without any problems. But when I use the -mfx- post-
estimation command to get the marginal effects, it takes a long
time. In fact, it's been going for over a day and still has not
produced anything. So my question is - do I need to just be
patient? Why would this take so long? I have approximately 200 of
these fixed effects, so possibly it has something to do with this,
and I just need to be patient? Or, is this sympotmatic of something
else? And why might -mfx- break down like that at all? Should I
consider -prchange- instead? And if I do use -prchange-, will it
easily adapt into -estout- so that I can save the estimates and
produce tables?
thanks,
scott
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/