| ![]() |
From | "Christer Thrane" <ch-thran@online.no> |
To | <statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu> |
Subject | st: Re: RE: adjust after heckman |
Date | Fri, 7 Apr 2006 18:08:21 +0200 |
Unfortunately, -adjust- does not have predict option, but you can
-preserve-, -replace-, and -predict, ycond-.
The following generates the conditional expectation for 5 values of mpg with
the other variables at their means.
sysuse auto
preserve
qui heckman price mpg weight length , select(fore = trunk )
foreach v of varlist weight trunk length {
sum `v', meanonly
replace `v' = r(mean)
}
forv i = 10(10)50 {
replace mpg = `i'
predict ycond_`i', ycond
}
tabstat ycond*, stat(mean)
restore
Scott
-----Original Message----- From: owner-statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu [mailto:owner- statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of Christer Thrane Sent: Friday, April 07, 2006 9:22 AM To: statalist@hsphsun2.harvard.edu Subject: st: adjust after heckman Hi, Normally I use adjust (after -regress-) to predict the mean earnings for variuos combinations of my indeps. When doing this for -heckman- I suspect that adjust produces the prediction for the "latent" mean earnings (ie regardless of if a person actually is employed or not). However, I want to get the mean earnings for the variuos combinations of my indeps, condtitional on being employed (ie being observed). How do I do this? Best regards, Christer Thrane* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2025 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |