Statalist The Stata Listserver


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: Re: Doubt about xtivreg,first differences


From   "AbdelRahmen El Lahga" <[email protected]>
To   <[email protected]>
Subject   st: Re: Doubt about xtivreg,first differences
Date   Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:21:20 +0100

Rafael
for your secon question see xtivreg2
if not installed in your maxhine tape within Stata:
findit xtivreg2

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rafael Terra de Menezes" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 8:09 PM
Subject: st: Doubt about xtivreg,first differences


> Dear Stata users,
>
>
> I'm usin the command xtivreg, fd and some doubts arose while working with
> it. First, I ran the following:
>
> xtivreg y w y z (l.y=l(2).y), fd
>
> My panel has T=10 and the output shows T=7. I know first differencing the
> equation sweep out one period, and because there is a lag dependent
> variable, two years are swept out. I would like to know if the fact that
I'm
> using yt-2  as instrument makes me lose another year.
>
> Another question:  Is there any test to run after xtivreg,fd (test for
> validity of instruments for example)? And how can I deal
heteroskedasticity
> in xtivreg?
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael Terra de Menezes
> University of S�o Paulo - Brazil
> Ms Student
>
>
> *
> *   For searches and help try:
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> *   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index