More generally, Bland-Altman plots are just
special case of residual vs fitted plots,
an idea with even longer roots. So after
an appropriate -regress-, -rvfplot- is
yet another way to do it.
Other discussions of this area have appeared in
2004. Graphing agreement and disagreement.
The Stata Journal 4: 329--349.
and will appear in
Assessing agreement of measurements and
predictions in geomorphology. Geomorphology
in press
Nick
[email protected]
Nick Cox
>
> Recently I've realised that in adding some details
> to -concord-, Tom Steichen and I have unwittingly
> revisited territory surveyed by Paul Seed in STB-55.
> As he in turn didn't quote our prior work from STB-43 this
> may look like some sordid dispute, but in each
> case no more than ignorance and oversight is to blame.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
>
> Hom, Willard
>
> > I'm wondering if anyone knows if it is appropriate to use the
> > Bland-Altman approach (as implemented
> > in STATA) for comparing the measurements from two separate
> > rating mechanisms. That is, I'm checking
> > whether two rating sytems that rate the same population of
> > objects can be "tested" for their
> > equivalence through the Bland-Altman method (plots, etc.).
> >
> > In my perusal of literature that mentions use of the
> > Bland-Altman method, I have only seen its
> > application in the comparison of two measurement devices that
> > measure 'physical qualities" (as in
> > medical/health research). Has anyone seen an application
> > (and a defensible one) of the method in
> > psychology, sociology, or economics, where there may be an
> > interest in exploring the equivalence of
> > two sets of ratings of the same objects/persons/constructs....
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
