Thanks Richard -- I am away from that data now, but will email the
syntax when I get a chance.
Regards,
wg
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Richard
Williams
Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2005 10:25 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: st: -hireg- quirky output
At 10:53 AM 11/2/2005, Garrard, Wendy M. wrote:
>Hello Statalist,
>In trying to use the -hireg- command I ran into a few issues.
>
>(1) The NOMISS option did not seem to be recognized.
>(2) Some variables were omitted in the last block of predictors to be
>added (e.g., it added 4 out of 6, dropping last 2).
>
>Has anyone else run into this? Could it be due my using -hireg- with
>Stata9?
>
>Thanks,
>wg
Works for me. Is there perfect multicollinearity among your variables,
by any chance? Why don't you include your syntax & output
- maybe you are just typing the command wrong, or maybe you've found a
bug that only shows up under certain conditions. Also, remember Stata
is very case-sensitive.
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX: (574)288-4373
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
