Ok.
I will consider a table doing something like:
-on the top: available
-on the bottom: unavailable
Allow me some time to make the necessary changes.
I also suppress all the red marks (replaced by green).
Many thanks for your support. Stata list is indeed the
best place to learn stata.
Amadou.
Jean-Benoit Hardouin
<jean-benoit.hardouin@ors To: [email protected]
centre.org> cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: st: RE: New command in SSC: -checkfor2-
owner-statalist@hsphsun2.
harvard.edu
09/19/2005 03:02 PM
Please respond to
statalist
[email protected] a �crit :
>Jean,
>I will try to improve my code based on your remarks.
>Essentially, I used anything in place of varlist because with the latter
>the program aborts when a variable specified does not
>exist. But this is the core of the program: check whether
>the variable exists or not.
>
>
OK, that's right (I have considered only one (other) aim which interests
me : the possibility to obtain a list of the variables with a little
amount of missing values)
>I will consider the use of return, but why a table?
>
>
If you have full of variables, your outputs are difficult to read: a
table allows obtaining a synthetic result !
Best,
Jean-Benoit
>I'll contact you privately to further discuss about these topics.
>Best regards.
>Amadou.
>
>
>
>
> Jean-Benoit Hardouin
> <jean-benoit.hardouin@ors To:
[email protected]
> centre.org> cc:
> Sent by: Subject: Re: st: RE:
New command in SSC: -checkfor2-
> owner-statalist@hsphsun2.
> harvard.edu
>
>
> 09/19/2005 02:28 PM
> Please respond to
> statalist
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Dear Amadou,
>I find several drawbacks in the programing of -checkfor2- :
> - the use of "anything" instead of "varlist" in the syntax command
>avoids to use list of variables as var1-var10 or var*
> - the idea to use a global macro variable is, from my mind, a bad
>idea (I prefer a "return" command)
> - the "red" characters concerns by convention the error messages
>and are not adapted to an output
> - the "outputs" as string are not very easy to read when we have
>full of variables (why not a table)
> - the smcl syntax in the hlp file is uncorrect to format the
>paragraphs: the result is not very nice
> - the classical way to present the hlp file is to separate the
>description of the options and the syntax (in 2 parts)
>I hope this help !
>The idea of your command is good, but your command is not very easy to
>use !
>
>/*Amadou, pas de probl�me si tu as besoin d'aide en fran�ais pour
>am�liorer ta commande !*/
>
>Jean-Benoit Hardouin
>
>
>*******************************************
>Jean-Benoit Hardouin
>Regional Health Observatory - Orl�ans - France
>
>Biostatisticien
>Observatoire R�gional de la Sant� du Centre
>BP 2439
>1, rue Porte Madeleine
>45032 Orl�ans Cedex 1
>t�l : 02 38 74 48 80
>fax : 02 38 74 48 81
>Email : [email protected]
>*********************************************
>
>
>
>[email protected] a �crit :
>
>
>
>>A long way to go before becoming a good stata programmer.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Thanks to Nick.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>I will make the necessary corrections today and resubmit.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>You've made two very good observations. And I really need
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>that kind of remarks to help me improve my first steps as
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>a real stata programmer.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>I am so used of nmissing that I guess I've used it without even
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>noticing it.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>In the same token, working with DHS data usually require sorting
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>data before attempting many managements.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>I guess there also, my old reflexes just prompted up, without even
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>noticing.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Again, thanks for your good remarks. In the future, I'll be more
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>cautious to these kind of details.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>>Amadou.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> "Nick Cox"
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> <[email protected]> To:
>>
>>
><[email protected]>
>
>
>> Sent by: cc:
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> owner-statalist@hsphsun2. Subject: st: RE: New
>>
>>
>command in SSC: -checkfor2-
>
>
>> harvard.edu
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> 09/19/2005 01:05 PM
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> Please respond to
>>
>>
>
>
>
>> statalist
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>Note that -checkfor2- runs the user-written command -nmissing-
>>which would need to be installed separately if a user had
>>not previously installed that. The help file makes
>>a cross-reference to this program but does not spell out
>>that it is required.
>>
>>As it happens, it is not clear why -nmissing- is used at
>>all, as it is only employed to pick up the number of
>>missings which could, and indeed should, be done much
>>more efficiently and directly with a -count-.
>>
>>Another detail that is worthy of note is that -checkfor2-
>>-sort-s on each variable in turn. This is not documented,
>>appears unnecessary for what the program does, and is
>>indeed a misfeature as in general -checkfor2- will
>>change the sort order of your data. I think it is a
>>good principle that Stata commands should only change
>>the sort order of your data when that is a purpose
>>of the command and is also explicitly documented.
>>
>>Nick
>>[email protected]
>>
>>[email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thanks to Prof. Baum, a new Stata command is available from the SSC
>>>archives:
>>>
>>>-checkfor2- A Stata module to check whether a variable exists
>>>or not in a
>>>dataset.
>>>
>>>Description:
>>>
>>>checkfor2 is a routine to check for existence of a list of
>>>variables within a
>>>(usually big) data set.
>>>checkfor2 searchs through the data whether the variable
>>>exists. If it does not,
>>>a message is issued.
>>>If it does, the program looks for missings structure.
>>>Finally, if requested, the
>>>program stores the
>>>available variables in a macro for future use. A tolerance
>>>level for missings
>>>could also be set.
>>>To install the package, type:
>>>
>>> .ssc install checkfor2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>*
>>* For searches and help try:
>>* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
>>* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>>
>>
>>*
>>* For searches and help try:
>>* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
>>* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>>* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>*
>* For searches and help try:
>* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
>* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
>
>
>*
>* For searches and help try:
>* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
>* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
>
>
>
>
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
