I believe it is fail to reject because the z statistic is not
significant at any level...
Jesus
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jiehua CHEN
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: ask help for swilk
Hi,
Does anyone know how to interpret the result of swilk function. Like my
result is
swilk ag, lnnormal
Shapiro-Wilk W test for 3-parameter lognormal data
Variable | Obs W V z Prob>z
-------------+-------------------------------------------------
ag | 1199 0.79999 148.830 -1.088 0.86173
Shall I reject or accept the null hypothesis?
Thanks
Jiehua
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
