From | "Jun Xu" <[email protected]> |
To | [email protected] |
Subject | RE: st: testing IIA assumption in standard MNL |
Date | Sat, 20 Aug 2005 19:24:07 -0500 |
See http://www.indiana.edu/~jslsoc/spost_faqs/spostfaq016.htm Jun Xu Ph.D. Candidate Department of Sociology Indiana University at Bloomington http://mypage.iu.edu/~junxu
From: SC Wainwright <[email protected]>_________________________________________________________________
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: st: testing IIA assumption in standard MNL
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:46:30 +0100
hello statalist,
i have attempted to use the mlogtest with iia option and hausman option, as well
as the manual hausman code (running 2 regressions) to get the above test
working. mlogtest says "you used the old syntax" of hausman and refers me to
hausman,
hausman all partial, alleqs
which provides the following output(also when i use drop-down post-est menu);
no coefficients in common; specify equations(matchlist)
for problems with different equation names.
r(498);
i've subsequently tried matching each category and had no luck
'Child' found where integer expected but when using integers, these are not
recognised and giving output "equation Child not found r(111);"
hausman all partial, equations(1:2)
equation at not found
r(111);
i have a numeric floating 3-category dep var with "Child in school" "Child at
home" and "Child works"
shall i rename dependent variable ?
thanks
claire
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |