From | Roger Newson <[email protected]> |
To | [email protected] |
Subject | Re: st: non parametric tests |
Date | Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:24:39 +0100 |
At 18:11 10/08/2005, Ronan M Conroy wrote:
I don't know what SPSS meant by "superior" in this context. However, Kendall and Gibbons (1990) give a lot of reasons for preferring Kendall's tau to Spearman's rho, with or without ties. It is easier to interpret, and the central limit theorem works much faster for Kendall's tau than for Spearman's rho. Spearman's rho mainly caught on because it is easier than Kendall's tau to calculate without a computer, and this was an issue when Maurice Kendall was alive. (I seem to recall that he died in the early 1980s.)n j cox wrote:The old SPSS manual (Nie, Hull et al) maintaned that Kendall's tau-b was superior to Spearman's rho when there were many ties or a small number of individual values in one of the variables. I am not sure of the evidence for this - does anyone know?stefania_ottone >>> Is the spearman test run in stata corrected for ties? In -spearman- the correlation is just the Pearson correlation calculated on the ranks. Thus Stata does nothing special about ties. I think Stata here shares in a widespread prejudice: if ties are an issue for you, then either your sample is too small or the data are too problematic for Spearman to be appropriate. Getting the P-value exactly right if the main idea is dubious is putting the emphasis in the wrong place. No doubt other software can fill the gap.
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |