Nick Cox (incredibly!) replied:
> There is a factor of 10 adrift between these two examples.
>
> Your example based on Scott's code has (e.g.) "50" plotted
> at 0.05, i.e. the ratio shown / underlying is 1000.
>
> Your example using -mylabels- has (e.g.) "50" plotted
> at 0.5, i.e. the ratio is 100.
>
> Hence results _should_ differ.
Apologies: my mistake.
> Incidentally, I noted during a look at the help
> of -mylabels- that the one of the examples there
> is the wrong way round, and has been for a couple
> of years. That was probably the trigger for your
> original confusion. I'll get it fixed.
OK, excellent!
> As I am currently asleep, and this response is produced
> automatically, I will look at the graphs when I get them
> and are awake.
Graphs have sent - almost as automatically!
CLIVE NICHOLAS |t: 0(044)7903 397793
Politics |e: [email protected]
Newcastle University |http://www.ncl.ac.uk/geps
Whereever you go and whatever you do, just remember this. No matter how
many like you, admire you, love you or adore you, the number of people
turning up to your funeral will be largely determined by local weather
conditions.
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
