Dear Sir
I estimate GARCH model using intraday data about 30, 000 observations for 30
individual stocks.
When I use following estimation for one stock, the coefficients are same
with Eviews and Shazam but Stata need about 5 minutes and Eviews and Shazam
are bit of less time. However, it is ok.
arch r l.r, arch(1) garch(1) nolog
When I add volume in the variance equation to the following estimeation,
arch r l.r, het(vol) arch(1) garch(1) nolog
Stata need about 15 minutes and Eviews and Shazam are about 3 mintues. The
problem is that the values of coefficients from Stata are very different
from those of Eviews and Shazam but significant levels are same. I check
Eviews I use Marquardt optimal algorithm. Ok, so I change to following
estimation of BFGS algorithm:
arch r l.r, het(vol) arch(1) garch(1) nolog bfgs
I wait to 45 minutes, it didn�t give me results, so I stop it.
Can you help to solve this problem? Because I really like Stata and do
everything. Thanks in advance.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, 2 June 2005 11:56 AM
Subject:
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-ty
pe:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition;
b=kSa5OsgjYFPzjQuVK9PVt1+aTPW2H8+tGzdoiTAfDoBd13Z8DUa9AvMNKr+w05lTreCp0ExnB
iZohHEtDuvZKzUEhHGgXEaO5xYeoSvIQBDH8M3e4Qn6lNTxa3zdu2egBjZ4Se4+NRMSFHEXFK68
9n2vku64IxwpibKg+mwIb1Q=
Received: by 10.36.222.4 with SMTP id u4mr257731nzg; Wed, 01 Jun 2005
18:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.154.12 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2005 18:54:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 21:54:30 -0400
From: Cody Knox <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: st: HSHAZ iteration stopped at number 290.
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hsphsun2.harvard.edu
id j521sZt04684
Sender: [email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
X-imss-version: 2.025
X-imss-result: Passed
X-imss-scores: Clean:2.00184 C:2 M:3 S:5 R:5
X-imss-settings: Baseline:3 C:2 M:2 S:2 R:1 (0.5000 0.5000)
Dear statalist,
I need your help.
I have been running HSHAZ for a large dataset with a number of
covariates. After going through 280 iterations, STATA (hshaz) showed
virtually the same log likelihood for about 10 iterations and then
stopped to move into the next iteration - what a disaster!
If it had sent an error message, I would have had no choice but to
give up. Bottom line is STATA is still running using most of the CPU
capacity - and about a day and a half has passed.
Does anyone have similar experience (and got it through and got the
estimated results later)? Any tips/help are welcome. - if I stop here,
I should run the program for another 20 days... please help me.
Thanks,
Cody Knox
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
