So, I am reduced to the following suggestion,
unless someone else can see the problem:
log using myproblem.log
about
set trace on
<your command>
set trace off
log close
and send the log to tech-support at StataCorp.
Nick
[email protected]
Rubiana Chamarbagwala
>
> Thanks for your help Nick. Yes, both are up-to-date.
>
> Nick Cox wrote:
>
> >Thanks. My experiments indicate that neither the
> >number of predictors nor the length of their names
> >are problematic here, at least with Stata/SE. I can't see
> >what the problem is. Are your Stata executable and ados both fully
> >up-to-date?
> >
> >Nick
> >[email protected]
> >
> >Rubiana Chamarbagwala
> >
> >
> >
> >>The exact syntax I used was:
> >>
> >>bootstrap "dprobit ftptw p_rate m_rate year88 year93 year99 hhchild
> >>f_primary f_middle f_high f_college m_primary m_middle m_high
> >>m_college
> >>workmom lnpced asset age agesq urban lowcaste muslim
> season2 season3
> >>season4 male p_rate_male m_rate_male year88_male year93_male
> >>year99_male
> >>hhchild_male f_primary_male f_middle_male f_high_male
> f_college_male
> >>m_primary_male m_middle_male m_high_male m_college_male workmom_male
> >>lnpced_male asset_male age_male agesq_male urban_male lowcaste_male
> >>muslim_male season2_male season3_male season4_male state1
> >>state2 state3
> >>state4
> >>state5 state6 state7 state8 state9 state10 state11 state12 state13
> >>state14 state15 state16 state17 state18 state19 state20
> >>state21 state22
> >>state23 state24 state25 state26
> >>state27 state28 state30 state31" "_b[p_rate] _b[m_rate]
> >>_b[p_rate_male]
> >>_b[m_rate_male]", reps(1000) cluster(year_state)
> >>
> >>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
