Thanks Nick, that worked nicely. Do you know why didn't -egen
cut(),group()- produce similar results? I thought when you specifed
group it would bin the -cut()- values into -group()- sets of equal size.
I thought perhaps there might be a problem with ties, but it seems
unlikely since the random values are floats.
Not sure - but you did get groups of equal size -- 300 in group 0, 300 in
group 1, etc. However, you wanted them to be equal sized within each
block, and your programming did not accomplish that.
