Stata The Stata listserver
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

st: heckprob or biprob and getting lamda terms


From   fatma bircan <[email protected]>
To   [email protected]
Subject   st: heckprob or biprob and getting lamda terms
Date   Sun, 05 Dec 2004 23:16:20 +0200

Hi, 

I am trying to estimate an earnings equation for self-employed and
employed. To eliminate the selection bias I intend to use a double
probit model. Stata seems to offer two commands for this task,
heckprob and biprobit. I am not sure which one I should use. 

Heckprob seems to be more appropriate for my model. But, in any case I
need to get two selection terms (lambda s) for my earnings equations.
With heckprob command I only get the rho term but lambdas. I can
neither add the main equation (earnings eq.) with heckprob command. 

Anyone familiar with the problem please write me.

Thank you






*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/



© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC   |   Terms of use   |   Privacy   |   Contact us   |   What's new   |   Site index