Ok Nick,
I got it.
"Nick Cox"
<[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>
Sent by: cc:
owner-statalist@hsphsun2. Subject: st: RE: meaning of _result(#) in stata.
harvard.edu
09/07/2004 02:16 PM
Please respond to
statalist
No need for shame or even embarrassment.
-_result()- is oldstyle.
However, apart from rummaging in used-book
stores for old manuals, it is best to reverse
engineer the meaning from a comparison of
-disp_res- and -ret li- or -eret li-.
Nick
[email protected]
[email protected]
> I am ashamed to ask this but is there any paper or file that
> describes the
> complete meaning of _result() followed by a number?
> I know some concern mean, variance, etc.
> I also know that stata has new syntax for them through the
> e(name) r(name) etc
> capabilities.
> But sometimes, when reading old programs, I would like to
> know the exact meaning of the macro.
> Where can I find an exhaustive explanation for these macros?
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/