From | Constantine Daskalakis <[email protected]> |
To | [email protected] |
Subject | Re: st: Binomial confidence intervals |
Date | Tue, 07 Sep 2004 13:44:45 -0400 |
At 01:24 PM 9/7/2004, Richard Williams wrote:
The -ci- command includes several options for computing binomial confidence intervals: exact (the default), wilson, agresti and jeffreys. Just so I am clear on these, is "exact" really really really exact? Am I correct in guessing that "exact" can be the most difficult to do by hand, and the others are therefore approximations that are somewhat easier to calculate if you don't have a computer? Is there any reason I would not want to use "exact", other than perhaps to replicate a calculation done using one of the other methods? Thanks for any insights.I remember checking this at some point. The "exact" option indeed gives the exact binomial confidence interval (which requires an iterative algorithm to get the limits, eg, bifurkation algorithm). StatXact calls this the "Clopper-Pearson" interval.
-------------------------------------------
Richard Williams, Notre Dame Dept of Sociology
OFFICE: (574)631-6668, (574)631-6463
FAX: (574)288-4373
HOME: (574)289-5227
EMAIL: [email protected]
WWW (personal): http://www.nd.edu/~rwilliam
WWW (department): http://www.nd.edu/~soc
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |