From | Suzy <[email protected]> |
To | [email protected] |
Subject | Re: st: Again-Unique Case ID in Large Panel |
Date | Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:47:28 -0400 |
Hi, Suzy.
OK, if you are correct then both version of -duplicates- agree that I have no
duplicates. But, this means they both still disagree with -xtdes-, right?
My original starting point was that -xtdes- says I do not have unique identifcation,
but other approaches (now including both versions of -duplicates-) say that this
is incorrect, and I should (do) have unique identification.
Is there another misinterpretation on my part buried somewhere here?
Thanks,
Steve
P.S. just got Nick's post which seems to agree with me, once I accept Suzy's
interpretation on -duplicates-.
At 12:24 PM 8/4/2004, you wrote:
I believe that your output is saying that you have one copy of 1322511 with no surpluses (no duplicates). I just ran this yesterday with my much smaller dataset and was able to verify this.
Suzy
Stephen V. Burks wrote:
Hi, Folks. Now I wonder if I am reporting a bug. As per Nick's suggestion (thanks, Nick) I looked up -duplicates- and ran it. Results: (1) using -duplicates report- . duplicates report DRVNUM CDATE Duplicates in terms of DRVNUM CDATE -------------------------------------- copies | observations surplus ----------+--------------------------- 1 | 1322511 0 -------------------------------------- (2) using -duplicates list- . duplicates list DRVNUM CDATE Duplicates in terms of DRVNUM CDATE (0 observations are duplicates) If I read this correctly, one version of -duplicates- says I have a single duplicate (the last case in the file), while the other says I have none. Also, -xtdes- still says that DRVNUM and CDATE do not uniquely identify cases. I looked in the data browser, and the last case is NOT a duplicate. While DRVNUM is the same as the case before, CDATE is not. If my interpretation of the output is correct then my best guess is that -xtdes- is wrong to say I do not have unique identification, and whatever bug causes this might also be behind the apparently incorrect response from -duplicates report-. In any event, it seems to be a problem that -duplicates list- and -xtdes- do not agree. Any better ideas? Thanks, Steve P.S. My version of Stata is 8.2 for WinXP, with current updates. -------------------------------------------------- *Stephen V. Burks, Ph.D. *Assistant Professor of Economics and Management *University of Minnesota, Morris * *Division of Social Sciences *600 East 4th Street *Morris, MN 56267-2134 * *Voice: (320) 589-6191 *Division Staff: (320) 589-6200 *FAX: (320) 589-6117 *E-Mail: [email protected] * * "Striving to be the Best National * Public Liberal Arts College in the U.S." --------------------------------------------------- * * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
--------------------------------------------------
*Stephen V. Burks, Ph.D.
*Assistant Professor of Economics and Management
*University of Minnesota, Morris
*
*Division of Social Sciences
*600 East 4th Street
*Morris, MN 56267-2134
*
*Voice: (320) 589-6191
*Division Staff: (320) 589-6200
*FAX: (320) 589-6117
*E-Mail: [email protected]
*
* "Striving to be the Best National
* Public Liberal Arts College in the U.S."
--------------------------------------------------- *
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
* * For searches and help try: * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |