<sacrifice this line?>
The half-missing first sentence from my previous -- which
as occasionally happens was chopped by
the Statalist software -- was
"Bill: This is a very helpful analysis, but we have to
impute the missing reference here."
Nick
[email protected]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Dupont,
> William
> Sent: 15 April 2004 21:07
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: RE: Imputing values for categorical data
>
>
> Nick
>
> Your imputation is correct. Thanks for the clarification.
>
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Cox
> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:03 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: Imputing values for categorical data
>
>
> impute the missing reference here. In this case, it
> happens to be a book I know about.
> (In other cases, in other postings, just giving
> author surnames and dates makes the reference search
> difficult: list members please note.)
>
> Statistical Analysis With Missing Data, Second Edition
> Roderick J. A. Little, Donald B. Rubin
> ISBN: 0-471-18386-5 Wiley
> September 2002
>
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
