From | Richard Williams <[email protected]> |
To | [email protected] |
Subject | Re: st: stata and weighting |
Date | Thu, 11 Mar 2004 08:29:00 -0500 |
At 07:59 AM 3/11/2004 -0500, Nick Winter wrote:
More generally, my sense is that some other statistics packages (especially SPSS; I can't speak for others), don't distinguish between types of weights, and therefore make it very difficult to even know what, exactly, you are getting. Stata makes you think about what you really want your weights to do, which IMHO is a feature.Yes, I would say that what SPSS does is the equivalent of iweights. Whoever provides the weights may have computed them in such a way that they become the equivalent of aweights. Or, you have to rescale the weights yourself to make them aweights. I was struck by the User's Guide discussion of how aweights have historically been misused, because what it described is what I've basically done with SPSS for years.
© Copyright 1996–2024 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |