Hi,
Although I cannot provide a shorcut to your specific question, the commands
-decomp- and -decompose- does the the Oaxaca/Blinder decompositions
automatically. They also offer some extensions.
If you have not installed them, write -findit decomp- on the command line.
Best regards,
Christer
Christer Thrane, dr.polit.
Associate Professor, Sociology
Department of Social Science
Lillehammer University College
2626 Lillehammer, Norway
+ 47 61 28 81 70 (fax)
+ 47 61 28 82 47 (phone, work)
+ 47 61 25 68 44 (phone, home)
+ 47 92 29 54 39 (mobile)
E-mail, work: [email protected]
E-mail, home: [email protected]
                                                                                                                                               
                      "Ada Ma"                                                                                                                 
                      <[email protected]        To:       [email protected]                                                
                      >                                cc:                                                                                     
                      Sent by:                         Subject:  st: any shortcut for oaxaca decomposition                                     
                      owner-statalist@hsphsun2.                                                                                                
                      harvard.edu                                                                                                              
                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                               
                      25.11.2003 13:19                                                                                                         
                      Please respond to                                                                                                        
                      statalist                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                               
                                                                                                                                               
Hi,
I am doing some oaxaca decompositions and I'm looking for some shortcuts,
thus I ran the two following estimations:
[1] separate estimations for male and female: wage = alpha + beta1*gamma +
beta2*zeta
[2] one estimation, but with interactive dummies (female = 1 for women)
     wage = alpha + beta1*gamma + beta2*zeta + beta3*female +
beta4*female*gamma + beta5*female*zeta
Now my question is why is it that the estimated beta1 in [2] differ from
that of beta1 in the male estimation in [1]?  And why is it that the
summation of beta1 and beta4 in estimation [2] would equal to beta1 for
females in estimation [1]?
I know I'm making different assumptions regarding the error terms in
estimations [1] and [2], but what elses are driving the differences?
Many thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Ada Ma
-----------------------------------------
Dept of Econ
Univ of Aberdeen
[email protected]
_________________________________________________________________
Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger
http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
 *   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/