*Very* quick correction here: I should have said I'm *not* angry about the
issue of the manuals. Typo there!! *lol*
C.
> Sam,
>
> A 'Clive-support' group: I rather like the idea of that!! *lol* And as for
> being a Microsoft plant, please! :-) It's certainly not my intention to
> "drive everyone else off the list". How could I? Anyway, it's not out of
> the question that I may find a way of getting [R] in the near-future, and
> it may be possible to get my library to get it (but I won't hold my
> breath!). I should point out that I'm angry about the issue of manuals,
> but when you say they're a long-term investment, they are (in part) only
> short-term, since they'll get replaced when Stata 9 comes along (which is
> already being talked about!).
[...]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/