Ramani,
why don;t you multiply the weights by a hundred (or whatever; a thousand),
and then create integers. kdensity should work then.
best, branko
IMPORTANTISSIMO!!!
From around October 15, 2003 my new
Email address will be
[email protected]
ALL ABOUT INEQUALITY IN THE WORLD (AND MORE!)
http://www.worldbank.org/research/inequality/
Ramani Gunatilaka
<[email protected] To:
ash.edu.au> [email protected]
Sent by: cc:
[email protected] Subject: st: Use of Weights in Kernel Density Estimation
ard.edu
11/16/2003 09:11 AM
Please respond to statalist
Hi all,
I hope there maybe someone out there who may be able to help me with this query.
I have a household level data set of roughly 19,000 households with the
following variables: per capita consumption in rupees (x), population weights
(w) and household size (hhsize) as in the sample below (I'm sorry the column
heads are not aligned).
x w hhsize
204.4059 176.45 3
402.0174 119.22 6
218.7155 51.84 8
1083.199 1266.73 6
303.6877 169.54 3
The weights represent the number of households in the entire population that
each particular household represents.
I need to estimate the kernel density of the consumption distribution and have
consulted Stata's kdensity function as well as the akdensity module developed by
Van Kerm. Both permit the use of weights, but only of fweights and aweights. But
while the weights in my data set are frequency weights, they are certainly not
integers as required by Stata.
Would someone know how I may get round this problem? I'd rather use the kdensity
or akdensity commands and not have to write up a programme from scratch.
Thanks so much,
Ramani
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/