From | Constantine Daskalakis <[email protected]> |
To | [email protected] |
Subject | RE: st: interactions |
Date | Thu, 26 Jun 2003 13:16:14 -0400 |
At 01:02 PM 6/26/03, David E Moore wrote:
Let me say at the outset that I applaud any conscientious effort to examine theI think the question has things backwards. The point of the interactions is that they allow us to relax model assumptions (notably, that of additivity). As such, they indeed make much sense -- they actually allow us to fit a more flexible model.
plausibility of nonlinear and/or nonadditive models. Notwithstanding that, my
answer to R. Allen Reese's question, "Do cont*cont interactions make sense?" is
still yes. If it's always a leap of faith to have a linear additive model, then perhaps one might want to think twice about creating interaction terms that assume linear relationships.
© Copyright 1996–2025 StataCorp LLC | Terms of use | Privacy | Contact us | What's new | Site index |