[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date index][Thread index]

Re: st: RE: Signtest (statistics question), thanks and a further question

From	Nick Cox <[email protected]>
To	[email protected]
Subject	Re: st: RE: Signtest (statistics question), thanks and a further question
Date	Mon, 12 May 2003 17:43:04 +0100

Roger Newson 

> >My understanding ... was that since I have paired observations 

> >Ranksum would be inapropriate.

> As  Guillaume says, -ranksum- is not appropriate in the paired case.

That was my misreading of Guillaume's problem. 
> 
Nick
[email protected]
*
*   For searches and help try:
*   http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
*   http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
*   http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/

Follow-Ups:
- st: Limit on imputing miss values?
  - From: "Sabine N. Merz" <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: st: RE: Signtest (statistics question), thanks and a further question
  - From: Roger Newson <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: st: RE: Signtest (statistics question), thanks and a further question
Next by Date: st: question about multinomial transition model
Previous by thread: Re: st: RE: Signtest (statistics question), thanks and a further question
Next by thread: st: Limit on imputing miss values?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread