I personally do not think it is much extra work to use a -foreach- loop, so
don't bother on my account if it involves undue violence to the code. But
regardless, thank you for your generous offer.
Best,
Lee
Lee Sieswerda, Epidemiologist
Thunder Bay District Health Unit
999 Balmoral Street
Thunder Bay, Ontario
Canada P7B 6E7
Tel: +1 (807) 625-5957
Fax: +1 (807) 623-2369
[email protected]
www.tbdhu.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Cox [SMTP:[email protected]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:51 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: st: RE: RE: RE: Summarising multiple tabulations in one
> table
>
> Lee Sieswerda
> >
> > If I'm understanding your data structure correctly, you
> > could use -tabm-
> > with the -trans- and -col- options. Currently, -tabm- is
> > not by-able, so you
> > would need to use -if-. As in:
> >
> > foreach n in 0/10 {
> > tabm agekst* if cohort==`n', trans col
> > }
> >
>
> If -tabm- could do with being -by-able, I
> will do it. But underneath the surface
> that's a lot of thrashing around with files.
>
> Nick
> [email protected]
> *
> * For searches and help try:
> * http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
> * http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
> * http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
