Thanks Joel,
Your suggestion seems to work. Like you though, I still don�t know why the
results are missing in the output table.
Regards,
Francisco.
Francisco
See my post from yesterday with the same question.
You can get the same results, I believe, with test using the second syntax,
which will test the hypothesis that all coefficients are equal to zero and
give you the F (k, n) and Prob > F results.
Joel
At 03:43 PM 6/29/02 -0300, you wrote:
>Dear Statalisters:
>
>I'm running simple OLS regressions with robust standard errors.
>In some cases the F-stat of the regression and Prob>F are reported as a
dot
>".", like in the example below.
>The problem does not show up if I run the same regression without robust
>standard errors.
>Can someone tell me what can be going on here?
>Thanks,
> Francisco.
>
>Regression with robust standard errors Number of obs =
>1175
> F( 25, 1148) =
>.
> Prob > F =
>.
> R-squared =
>0.6376
> Root MSE =
>.55503
>
>*
>* For searches and help try:
>* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
>* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
>* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*************************************************
Joel E. Pike
School of Business
University of Wisconsin
1238 Grainger Hall
975 University Avenue
Madison, WI 53706-1323
Tel: 608-265-4830
*************************************************
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
