Julian & Bill--
As nice as the -memory- command is, it has the downside of requiring
you to load the data in memory before issuing the command, whereas the
-describe- command has the handy using option. If you are deciding
how much memory to allocate with -set mem Xm- for example, it's
helpful to not have to load the data first.
--Austin
On 12/5/06, William Gould, Stata <[email protected]> wrote:
Julian Reif <[email protected]> asked,
> Is there a Stata command available that returns the size of the dataset in
> memory? I am running a series of very long scripts at the same time on a
> server and am performing an analysis to determine what the optimal memory
> allocation should be for each series of scripts. I know that the -describe-
> command will tell you the size, but it does not return the value in a local
> and I'd rather not go hunting through log files if possible.
I suggest Julian try the -memory- command, which presents a report and leaves
results behind in r(). The results are different that those reported by
-describe- but they may be more in line with what Julian wants, as these
numbers are more system related and include overhead.
-- Bill
[email protected]
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
*
* For searches and help try:
* http://www.stata.com/support/faqs/res/findit.html
* http://www.stata.com/support/statalist/faq
* http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/stata/
